The schatological dream revisited: a new reading of Seneca’s Ep. CII

Main Article Content

Soledad Correa

Abstract

The problem of the post-mortal continuation of the soul is an open issue in Seneca’s oeuvre. In his Epistulae the philosopher portrays himself while reflecting on this dilemma, which he builds in terms of the so called “Socratic alternative”, i.e. death is either something that “destroys or sets us free” (Ep., XXIV, 17). Interestingly, in Ep. CII Seneca dramatizes his own surrender to the “bellum somnium” of immortality. The current article aims at showing that the epistolary frame offers a key to read this dramatization of his surrender to the eschatological dream not as a mere “sentimental or consolatory demand” (Setaioli, 2000, p. 317), but as an attempt of textual rather than ontological transcendency. In this sense, we propose to reconsider the rendering of the somnium-cogitatio (CII, 21-29) as the meditative writing of a reading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Correa, S. (2024). The schatological dream revisited: a new reading of Seneca’s Ep. CII. Auster, (29), e091. https://doi.org/10.24215/23468890e091
Section
Articles

References

André, J.-M. (1970). Sénèque et l’Épicurisme: ultime position. Actes du VIIIe Congrès l’Association Guillaume Budé (pp. 469-480). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989). Sapientiae facies. Étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.lesbelleslettres.5564

Berno, F.R. (2006), L. Anneo Seneca, Lettere a Lucilio, libro VI, Le lettere (pp. 53-56). Bolonia: Pàtron.

Bocciolini Palagi, L. (1979). Seneca e il sogno escatologico. Studi italiani di filologia classica, 51(1-2), 155-168.

Borgo A. (1998). Lessico morale di Seneca. Napoli: Loffredo.

Conradie, I. (2010). Seneca in His Cultural and Literary Context: Selected Moral Letters on the Body. Utrecht.

Correa, S. (2021). Tiempo y ejemplaridad en la Epistula 101 de Séneca. Lucius Annaeus Seneca, 1, 111–134. Recuperado de https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa01/lucius_annaeus_seneca/article/view/1935

Desbordes, F. (1995). Concepciones sobre la escritura en la Antigüedad Romana. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Graver, M. (1996). Therapeutic Reading in Seneca’s Moral Epistles (tesis doctoral inédita). Brown University.

Graver, M. R. (2016). The Emotional Intelligence of Epicureans: Doctrinalism and Adaptation in Seneca’s Epistles. En G. D. Williams, K. Volk (Eds.), Roman Reflections. Studies in Latin Philosophy (pp. 1925-210). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999767.003.0010

Graver, M. (2023). Seneca. The Literary Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683125

Griffin, M. (1976). Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gunderson, E. (2015). The Sublime Seneca. Ethics, literature, metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316106204

Habinek, T. (2000). Seneca’s Renown: ‘Gloria, Claritudo’, and the Replication of the Roman Elite. ClAnt, 19(2), 264-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25011122

Hadot, P. (1999). Philosophy as a Way of Life. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hoven, R. (1971). Stoïcisme et Stoïciens face au problème de l’au-delà. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

Inwood, B. (2007). The Importance of Form in the Letters of Seneca the Younger. En R. Morello; A. Morrison (Eds.), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (pp. 133-148). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199203956.003.0006

Lausberg, H. (1998). Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004663213

Leeman, A.D. (1951). The Epistolary Form of Sen. Ep.102. Mnemosyne, 4(4), 175-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852551X00192

Long, A. (2019). Death and Immortality in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091562

Mazzoli, G. (1989). Le ‘Epistulae morales ad Lucilium’ di Seneca: Valore letterario e filosofico. Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, 2(36.3), 1923-1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851526-015

Mazzoli, G. (1991). Effetti di cornice nell’epistolario senecano. En A. Setaioli (Ed.), Seneca e la cultura: atti del convegno, Perugia 9-10 nov. 1989 (pp. 67-87). Napoli.

Motto, A. L. y Clark, J. R. (1968). ‘Paradoxum Senecae’: The Epicurean Stoic. CW, 62/2, 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4346663

Mutschmann, H. (1915). Seneca und Epikur. Hermes, 50, 321-356.

Németh, A. (2023). Seneca and the Narrative Self. British Journal of Philosophy, 31/5, 845-865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2023.2179015

Nussbaum, M.C. (2012). La terapia del deseo. Teoría y práctica en la ética helenística. Barcelona: Paidós.

Papaioannou, S. (2020). Reading Seneca reading Vergil. En M. Garani, A. N. Michalpoulos, S. Papaioannou (Eds.), Intertextualityin Seneca’s Philosophical Writing (pp. 107-129). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318153-7

Reynolds, L.D. (1965). L. Annaei Senecae ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schafer, J. (2011). Seneca’s Epistulae Morales As Dramatized Education. CPh, 106(1), 32–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/659109

Schiesaro, A. (2015). Seneca and Epicurus: The Allure of the Other. En S. Bartsch, A. Schiesaro (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca (pp. 239-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139542746.022

Schottlaender, R. (1955). Epikureisches bei Seneca: Ein Ringen um den Sinn von Freude und Freundschaft. Philologus, 99, 133-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1955.99.12.133

Setaioli, A. (2000). Facundus Seneca. Aspetti della lingua e dell’ideologia senecana. Bologna: Pàtron.

Setaioli, A. (2013). Cicero and Seneca on the Fate of the Soul: Private Feelings and Philosophical Doctrines. En J. Rüpke (Ed.), The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean (pp. 455–488). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674503.003.0017

Smith, R.S. (2014). Physics I: Body and soul. En G. Damschen, A. Heil (Eds.), Brill’s Companion to Seneca (pp. 343-362). Leiden; Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217089_030

Spallone, M. (1995). 'Edizioni’ tardoantiche e tradizione medievale dei testi: il caso delle Epistulae ad Lucilium di Seneca. En O. Pecere y M. D. Reeve (Eds.). Formative stages of classical traditions: Latin texts from antiquity to the Renaissance (pp. 96-149). Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull'Alto Medioevo.

Traina, A. (1978). Lo Stile ‘drammatico’ del filosofo Seneca. Bologna: Pàtron.

Tutrone, F. (2023). Healing Grief. A Commentary on Seneca’s Consolatio ad Marciam. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111014845

Wildberger, J. (2010). Praebebamenim me facilem opinionibus magnorum virorum: The Reception of Plato in Seneca, Epistulae Morales 102. En V. Harte, M. M. McCabe, R.A. Sharples, A. Sheppard (Eds.), Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato (pp. 205-232). London: Institute of Classical Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2011.tb00018.x

Wildberger, J. (2014). The Epicurus Trope and the Construction of a ‘Letter Writer’. En J. Wildberger, M. Colish (Eds.), Seneca Philosophus (pp. 431-465). Berlin – New York: De Gruyter, 431-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.431

Williams, G. (2021). Eschatology in Seneca: The Senses of an Ending. En H. Marlow, K. Pollmann y H. van Noorden (Eds.), Eschatology in Antiquity: Forms and Functions (pp. 320-332). London-New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315459486-23